Trade Tidbits – March 6, 2026

chain grey

ON DECK

    • Tracking the Iran supply chain shock
    • Courts get to work on refund rulings, but still a ways to go it appears
    • Still no 15% 122 yet, still no new 232s or 301s
    • U.S. China to huddle next week ahead of Trump visit; European Parliament postpones vote on deal again; U.S., Mexico officially launch USMCA review consultations; South Korean Trade Minister urges bill to pass on time; Switzerland says it’ll keep trade talks

DISCLAIMER: The below is intended to inform, not to be construed as an official statement from the office of Rep. Yakym

Tidbits

Iran Sitrep

Veteran subscribers will know that when there’s some sort of sudden and sustained supply chain shock (COVID, Ever Given, Key Bridge collapse, etc.), I tend to pop updates at the top for a bit. And, well, there’s a new one with the military engagement against Iran. I’ll just be focusing on the supply chain-related aspects and a general state of play, not necessarily the day to day. With that, let’s get into it.

Iran has now launched strikes on 12 countries in its neighborhood, though the quantity of strikes has fallen off. Still, Iran has targeted oil refineries, sea ports, and airports. It has also vowed to attack ships transiting the Strait of Hormuz, through which about 20% of daily oil consumption transits. All this has already had massive impacts on energy and shipping.

Starting with energy, crude oil is hockey sticking, with WTI jumping from down around $65/barrel on 2/26 to $89 and Brent from $70 to $91. That, in turn has sent gas prices spiking from a nationwide average of about $2.98/gallon to $3.30 for regular unleaded and from $3.75 to $4.12 for diesel.

The White House is watching gas prices closely and starting to make some moves to attempt to drive down prices. National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said they have “a whole flow chart of tools to use.” The U.S. announced a 30-day waiver for India to buy Russian oil. It’s also weighing some action on the shipping side to keep supplies moving, which I’ll get to in a second. Beyond the U.S., countries are starting to look at rationing, while China told its oil refiners not to export gasoline or diesel.

The conflict is impacting LNG as well, with Qatar, the second-largest exporter, halting production, which has sent prices soaring for Europe and others in Asia. Qatar’s Energy Minister told the Financial Times that even if the conflict were to end today, it’ll take “weeks to months” for things to level out. It does sound like the first LNG cargo has been loaded, so we’ll see what happens from here. We’re already seeing impacts of the LNG spike on fertilizer production.

On to shipping. Flexport CEO Ryan Peterson had a good X thread on the overall state of play if you want a quick and dirty, but I’ll go through things as well. Amid such a sudden turn of events, insurance has seized up, with costs rising as much as 12x and some policies being canceled. Major shippers stopped accepting Gulf bookings and air cargo rates have surged.

We have reports that one container ship was hit by an “unknown projectile,” forcing its crew to abandon ship, but I haven’t seen any confirmation on the origin of the projectile. The Financial Times reports that at least seven tankers have been hit since Sunday, while others have received threatening radio messages from Iran. Even still, a few ships have Leroy Jenkinsed it through the Strait, but those are exceptions not the rule.

With shippers facing both security and financial risks, President Donald Trump truthed measures on Tuesday to try to address both. On security, he said, “if necessary, the United States Navy will begin escorting tankers through the Strait of Hormuz, as soon as possible.” And though the Navy engaged with the Houthis in the Red Sea last year, guaranteeing security there was overall easier said than done. Could be a similar situation in the Strait.

On insurance, he ordered “the United States Development Finance Corporation (DFC) to provide, at a very reasonable price, political risk insurance and guarantees for the Financial Security of ALL Maritime Trade, especially Energy, traveling through the Gulf.” Like the military escorts, this too may be easier said than done. Per the Financial Times, a JPMorgan analysis found that $352 billion is needed to underwrite all oil tankers in the region. However, Congress capped the DFC’s maximum total liability at $205 billion through 2031, and it’s already used $51.5 billion as of the end of 2025. Thus, the DFC can only cover $154 billion of the $352 billion. Still, insurers like Marsh, Aon, and Lloyd’s of London seem open to it.

Saudia Arabia is going to try to shift some shipments to the Red Sea, but the Houthis reminded everyone “hey we’re still here too,” warning of attacks there. France, Italy, and Greece, among others, are considering joining forces to ensure shipping stays online there.

Ok. Energy impacts, check. Shipping impacts, check. That’s it, right? Right? No. Because we have to have a trade threat too. After Spain kicked out U.S. military aircraft, President Trump threatened to “cut off all trade with Spain.” There wasn’t much elaboration from there, but Teresa Ribera, Spain’s EU commissioner, told local media, “It is not possible to engage in [individual] commercial retaliation or business relationships.” On Wednesday, the White House said there was an agreement to cooperation, which Spain denied. And that’s kinda where that sits.

Legal Eagleman (IYKYK)

As the Court of International Trade (CIT) gets its moment in the sun, the refund battle is heating up as over 2,000 lawsuits sit ready for action.

Last Friday, the Department of Justice urged the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to wait four-ish months to start refund proceedings to “allow the political branches an opportunity to consider options.” The court said nah on Monday, officially kicking things to the CIT.

On Wednesday, CIT Judge Richard Eaton told the government in a hearing, “Customs ⁠knows how to do this…They do it every day. ​They liquidate entries and make refunds.” And he handed down a ruling that said: “With respect to any and all unliquidated entries that were entered subject to the IEEPA duties, U.S. Customs and Border Protection is hereby directed to liquidate those entries without regard to the IEEPA duties. Any liquidated entries for which liquidation is not final shall be reliquidated without regard to IEEPA duties.” He also ordered CBP to stop calculating IEEPA tariffs, which was apparently still happening for some reason..

But this isn’t the final word. There was a hearing this morning in which CBP said it’s not currently able to comply with the order to refund tariffs. to discuss refund plans, plus a highly likely Trump Administration appeal.

Also of note, the government said it would pay interest on any refunds, which would make the delay playbook costly – $700 million/month costly, according to a Cato Institute report.

Two last notes on the legal front. The plaintiffs in Detroit Axle v. Trump want the CIT to also strike down the IEEPA de minimis suspension, arguing that flows directly from the SCOTUS decision too. And President Trump truthed wondering out loud, “Is a Rehearing or Readjudication of [Learning Resources] possible???”

Plan Bs Still Catching Zs

Still no paper on that increase in the Section 122 tariff from 10% to 15%. On Wednesday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNBC that it’d start this week, but this week is almost over. In the meantime, 24 states filed a lawsuit at the Court of International Trade (CIT) challenging the 122 tariffs, saying they’re hoping for a quick decision. We’ll see what the CIT has to say about that.

As for the Section 232 and 301 investigations that the 150-day 122 tariffs are supposed to be buying time for…well there’s not much to report there either. USTR Jamieson Greer said that the investigations will be completed in time for the expiration of the 122 tariffs. But he didn’t really get into specifics or contours otherwise.

News from the Rest of the World

  • China: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, USTR Jamieson Greer, and Vice Premier He Lifeng are expected to meet in Paris next week to check in ahead of President Donald Trump’s visit to Beijing at the end of the month. Per the report, the three will discuss possible Boeing and soybean purchases, Taiwan, and fentanyl. The U.S. may also ask China to purchase U.S. oil instead of the Russian stuff. The New York Times reports that a Taiwan arms sale was delayed so as not to disturb the visit. The U.S. is considering caps on Nvidia H200 chip sales per customer, while the Commerce Department has draft regulations that could restrict AI chip shipments globally, which could cut into evasion.
  • The EU: The European Parliament again postponed a vote on the trade deal and will meet on March 17 to talk about thinking about talking about scheduling the vote. A USTR spokesperson wouldn’t tell Bloomberg how much leash the EU has left, instead pointing to President Trump’s recent truth warning against trading partners playing games. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz was in the U.S. this week and met with President Trump, telling him the EU wouldn’t accept a deal with worse conditions. The EU says it did get assurances from the Trump Administration that the U.S. would keep the 10% tariff on it. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni lamented the tariffs as a “mistake” and said she wants a U.S.-EU free trade zone. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Brendan Carr threatened retaliation if the EU implements favors domestic satellite companies under its proposed Space Act.
  • Indonesia: Coordinating Minister Airlangga Hartarto assured local stakeholders that the Agreement on Reciprocal Trade (ART) will protect national regulations on halal imports.
  • Malaysia: Trade Minister Johari Ghani will hold a video call with Deputy USTR Rick Switzer next Tuesday to discuss the SCOTUS decision and the ART.
  • Mexico: The U.S. and Mexico announced that the first round of bilateral talks as part of the USMCA review would take place the week of March 16 and happen regularly thereafter.
  • South Korea: Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo urged the National Assembly to pass on time the bill implementing the trade deal. In a separate meeting, Minister Yeo said the government is working to minimize risks post-SCOTUS decision. 11 House Ways and Means Committee Republicans, led by Rep. Carol Miller (R-WV), sent a letter to USTR Jamieson Greer expressing concern about South Korea’s cloud services regulations.
  • Switzerland: The government released a statement after a Federal Council discussion of the SCOTUS decision, saying, “There is considerable uncertainty surrounding US trade policy…[The Federal Council] considers that a legally binding agreement will help to stabilise bilateral trade relations and further improve export opportunities for Swiss companies. It has therefore decided that negotiations with the USA will continue within the framework of the existing negotiating mandate. The parameters of the negotiations will be continuously reviewed and adjusted as necessary in line with developments in US policy.” Switzerland may reduce a defense purchase over pricing issues.

Quick Hits

What’s the Dealies, Yo?

This is my initial stab at building a list of trade deals (specifically Frameworks, Agreements on Free Trade, and a few others with one-off nomenclatures). If I missed something, please let me know! I’ll add that the Council on Foreign Relations also has a tracker.

Country

Type

Date

Argentina

Agreement on Reciprocal Trade

2/5/26

Bangladesh

Agreement on Reciprocal Trade

2/9/26

Cambodia

Agreement on Reciprocal Trade

10/26/25

Ecuador

Framework

11/13/25

El Salvador

Agreement on Reciprocal Trade

1/29/26

The EU

Framework

8/21/25

Guatemala

Agreement on Reciprocal Trade

1/30/26

India

Framework

2/6/26

Indonesia

Agreement on Reciprocal Trade

2/19/26

Japan

Agreement

9/4/25

Malaysia

Agreement on Reciprocal Trade

10/26/25

North Macedonia

Framework

2/12/26

South Korea

Joint Fact Sheet

11/13/25

Switzerland/

Liechtenstein

Framework

11/14/25

Taiwan

Agreement on Reciprocal Trade

2/12/26

Thailand

Framework

10/26/25

The Philippines

Truth Post

7/22/25

The UK

Economic Prosperity Deal

6/16/25

Vietnam

Framework

10/26/25

 

Tarif-Fone

Ok this is my post-SCOTUS revision. If I missed something or got something wrong, please let me know. It’s not unpossible.

Trade Actions in Effect

As of

Who

What

Rate

Authority

3/12/25

All countries

Steel products and derivatives

50%; UK at 25% (25% for all countries from 3/12/25-6/4/25)

Section 232

3/12/25

All countries

Aluminum products and derivatives

50%; UK at 25% (25% for all countries from 3/12/25-6/4/25; was 10% prior to 3/12/25)

Section 232

4/3/25

All countries

Autos

25%

Section 232

4/4/25

All countries

Beer and empty aluminum cans

25%

Section 232

5/2/25

China, Hong Kong

No more de minimis

N/A

IEEPA

5/3/25

All countries

Auto parts

25%

Section 232

6/23/25

All countries

Tariffs on steel derivatives (mostly appliances)

50% (25% for UK)

Section 232

8/1/25

All countries

Copper, scrap copper, and derivative products

50%

Section 232

8/18/25

All countries

Tariffs on steel and aluminum derivatives

50% (25% for UK) on steel or aluminum content; IEEPA rate applicable to country on non-steel or aluminum content

Section 232

8/29/25

All countries

Suspending de minimis

N/A

IEEPA

10/14/25

All countries (minus EU, Japan, UK)

Timber, lumber, and derivative products

10% or 25%, depending on product

Section 232

11/1/25

All countries

Trucks

10% or 25%, depending on the product

Section 232

1/15/26

All countries

Semiconductors and semiconductor manufacturing equipment used in certain applications

25%

Section 232

2/24/26

All countries

Most products

10% (but maybe 15% at some point)

Section 122

 

 

Coming Attractions

Status

Who

What

Rate

Authority

Effective 10/1/25(?)

All countries (probably)

Pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical ingredients

100% unless construction ongoing

Section 232

Due 10/28/25

All countries

Inclusions process for Section 232 copper

50%

Section 232

Report due 12/27/25 (comments due 5/7/25)

All countries (probably)

Pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical ingredients

TBD

Section 232

Report due 1/26/26 (comments due 6/3/25)

All countries (probably)

Commercial Aircraft and Jet Engines

TBD

Section 232

Report due 3/28/26 (comments due 8/6/25)

All countries (probably)

Polysilicon and its Derivatives

TBD

Section 232

Report due 3/28/26 (comments due 8/6/25)

All countries (probably)

Unmanned Aircraft Systems and Their Parts and Components

TBD

Section 232

Report due 5/10/26 (comments due 9/9/25)

All countries

Wind Turbines

TBD

Section 232

Report due 5/30/26 (comments due 10/17/25)

All countries

Personal Protective Equipment, Medical Consumables, and Medical Equipment, Including Devices  

TBD

Section 232

Report due 5/30/26 (comments due 10/17/25)

All countries

Robotics and Industrial Machinery

TBD

Section 232

Due 7/15/26

Brazil

Digital Trade and Electronic Payment Services; Unfair, Preferential Tariffs; Anti-Corruption Enforcement; Intellectual Property Protection; Ethanol Market Access; and Illegal Deforestation

TBD

Section 301

Action due 10/24/26 (hearing 12/16/25)

China

Compliance with Phase One agreement

TBD

Section 301

Suspended until 11/10/26

China

Certain Section 301 China tariff exclusions

7.5% or 25%

Section 301

Suspended until 11/10/26

Shipping companies

Ships servicing U.S. ports

Various fees

Section 301

Suspended until 11/10/26

China

Ship-to-shore cranes, intermodal chassis and parts

100%

Section 301

Effective 1/1/27

Nicaragua

Imports not originating under CAFTA-DR

10% (15% on 1/1/28)

Section 301

Effective 1/1/27

All countries (minus EU, Japan, UK)

Timber, lumber, and derivative products

10%, 30%, or 50% depending on product

Section 232

6/23/27

China

Semiconductors

TBD (announced at least 30 days in advance)

Section 301

TBD

All countries (probably)

Movies

100%

TBD (maybe Section 232)

TBD

All countries (probably)

Inclusions process for timber and lumber

TBD

Section 232

TBD

All countries (probably)

Inclusions process for truck parts

TBD

Section 232

TBD

Canada

Aircraft

50%

TBD

 

More
news